The 1960’s pop music the-1960s

Does the evidence of C support the evidence of Sources A and B about the effects of jut out music in the 1960s? Explain your answer.In my opinion I think that Source C doesnt support Sources A and B. I think this because from Source A you can learn that the Beatles had quite a big impact in the 1960s. This extract is from Joanna Lumley and instead of the rush hour an extraordinary silence and emptiness had descended upon London, on England, on Britain. This statement implies that countless people left movement earlier than usual to watch the Beatles. The Beatles were performing on Juke encase Jury. Juke Box Jury was Probably the most enduring of all pop panel shows and hosted by David Jacobs with his famous bell and hooter for Hit and Miss.From this quotation we can see that in that location was usually a crowd of people at the tube station, but today there was no-one and Joanna Lumley was surprised. I dare say that London must put on been quieter seeing as the Beatles were on t elevision, but considering that Joanna was only a young woman aged around 18, she maybe exaggerating just a little. This source was pen 30 years after it actually happened. Therefore there is a weakness of memory.Source B is a description about a concert which was in the 1960s, however it was written in the 1990s. When I was seventeen, in 1964 this quote proves that that whoever wrote the source was young and juvenile. So therefore they could have over exaggerated in this source. It was written 30 years after the event, so this source could be seen as feeble and biased. The concert in question was a Rolling Stones concert. The someone says We have dancing tickets, which meant that we could get really close this meant all the screaming girls could be very close to the Rolling Stones, this gave the concert more atmosphere. I can cogitate their terrified faces, when they were trying to get off the stage, surrounded by the heaving, maniacal screaming mob. The Rolling Stones were scar ed from all these fans. This person who wrote the source thought I doubt if the Stones ever played so near their audience again.Source C is capital of Minnesota McCartney, a Beatles member, describing the Beatles concerts. capital of Minnesota was talking in 1984, even though the concerts he is talking bout were in the 1960s and 70s. This source cannot be seen as entirely accurate because there could be lack of memory. In this source Paul says it was never as crazy as they used to say it was. I think by this quote that the fans who were actually there exaggerated more to start that experience they had seem better than what it was.I think that Source C doesnt support both Sources A and B because in Source C Paul says it wasnt that bad, fans were screaming but because they loved you, not that they wanted to hurt you. Some fans were obsessive but they just wanted autographs. In Source A, it says that everybody left work early to go and watch TV, she doesnt know everybody in the UK so she cannot say that. Along with Source B it says that the Rolling Stones were frightened, how did she know that for a fact, she didnt exactly let loose to them personally did she. So Source C contradicts Sources A and B.