Related Diversification Is a More Successful Strategy Essay Example for Free

Related Diversification Is a More Successful Strategy hear(exploitation of know-how, more efficient use of available resources and capacities). In addition, companies may also explore diversification middling to get a valuable comparison between this strategy and expansion. Types of diversifications Moving away from the core talent is termed as diversification. Diversification involves directions of development which take the organisation away from its present markets and its present products at the selfsame(prenominal) time.Diversification is of two types (i) Related diversification Related diversification is development beyond the present roduct and market, scarcely still within the broad confines of the industry (i. e. value chain) in which a play along operates. For example, an railway car manufacturer may engage in production of passenger vehicles and light trucks. (ii)Unrelated diversification Unrelated diversification is where the organisation moves beyond the conf ines of its real industry. For example ,a food processing firm manufacturing leather footgear as well.The different types of diversification strategies The strategies of diversification can include internal development of new products or arkets, acquisition of a firm, alliance with a complementary high society, licensing of new technologies, and distributing or importing a products decline manufactured by another firm. Generally, the final strategy involves a combination of these options. This combination is determined in function of available opportunities and consistency with the objectives and the resources of the company.There be three types of diversification concentric, horizontal and conglomerate (1) coaxial diversification The company adds new products or services which have technological or commercial ynergies with topical products and which will appeal to new customer groups. The objective is therefore to benefit from synergy effects referable to the complementariti es of activities, and thus to expand the firms market by attracting new groups of buyers. Concentric diversification does not chair the company into a completely new world as it operates in familiar territory in atomic number 53 of the two major fields (technology or marketing).Therefore that kind of diversification makes the task easier, although not needfully successful. (2)Horizontal diversification The company adds new products or services that are technologically or commercially nrelated to current products, but which may appeal to current customers. In a competitive environment, this form of diversification is preferable if the present customers are loyal to the current products and if the new products have a good quality and are well promoted and priced.Moreover, the new products are marketed to the same economic environment as the existing products, which may lead to rigidity and instability. In other words, this strategy tends to increase the firms dependence on certain market segments. (3) amass diversification (or lateral diversification) The company markets new roducts or services that have no technological or commercial synergies with current products, but which may appeal to new groups of customers. The conglomerate diversification has very teensy-weensy relationship with the firms current business.Therefore, the main reasons of adopting such a strategy are first to improve the profitableness and the flexibility of the company, and second to get a better reception in capital markets as the company gets bigger. Even if this strategy is very risky, it could also, if successful, provide increased growth and profitability. Risks in diversification Diversification is the riskiest of the quaternity strategies presented in the Ansoff matrix and requires the most careful investigation. Going into an unknown market with an unfamiliar product pass means a lack of experience in the new skills and techniques required.